Crowcon - Detecting Gas Saving Lives
27 November 2014
What are VOCs?

The nature of gas hazards posed by some working environments can be complex and complete protection is not available from a single solution. This week, our guest blogger, Richard, takes a look at VOCs: how they pose a hazard and what we can do to protect against them.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) tend to be liquids that readily give off vapor at room temperature, such as solvents and fuels. At high concentrations, these vapors can explode. At extremely low levels, they can be toxic. While the impact of exposure can sometimes be felt immediately, symptoms may not become apparent for months, if not years, later. Chronic illness can result from repeated and extended low-level exposure. Increased awareness of the chronic toxicity of VOCs has led to reduced occupational exposure limits (OEL) and increased requirements for direct measurement.

The most frequently hazardous form of VOC exposure is vapor inhalation. The best way of guarding against this is the use of a personal gas monitor, correctly worn – i.e. as close as reasonably possible to the breathing zone. In this way, it is exposed to the same levels of toxic gas as its wearer, so it can reliably alert them of the present danger.

A number of different toxic and explosive gases could be present in a working environment. A common approach when using personal instruments is to use a multi-sensor instrument capable of simultaneous monitoring for different atmospheric hazards. The information from the different sensors helps interpret what could be a complex mixture of gases.

It is vital that a personal gas monitor is configured correctly for the environment in which it is to be used. Specific sensors are available for the detection of some toxic gases. These should be used where exposure to that specific gas is a realistic possibility. Good examples are carbon dioxide in the carbonated drinks industry; carbon monoxide in the steel industry; and in water treatment, ozone and chlorine. There are sensors available for each of these gases, usually based on electrochemical technology. There are no such specific sensors for many of the VOC gases, however. In this case, different technology must be relied upon.

Photo-ionization detection
Photo-ionization detection technology is generally considered the technology of choice for monitoring exposure to toxic levels of VOCs. The sensors include a lamp as a source of high-energy ultraviolet (UV) light. The lamp encases a noble gas, most commonly krypton, and electrodes. The UV light’s energy excites the neutrally charged VOC molecules, so removing an electron.

The amount of energy needed to remove an electron from a VOC molecule is called the ionization potential (IP). The larger the molecule, or the more double or triple bonds the molecule contains, the lower the IP. Thus, in general, the larger the molecule, the easier it is to detect. Furthermore, this technology does not require use of a sinter, which might prevent the gas reaching the sensor. It is also not susceptible to poisoning by chemicals in cleaning products, or silicone.

PID is very sensitive and will respond to many different VOCs. The magnitude of the response is directly proportionate to the concentration of the gas. However, 50ppm of one gas will give a different reading to 50ppm of a different gas. To cope with this, detectors are usually calibrated to isobutylene and then a correction factor is employed to get accurate readings for a target gas. Each gas has a different correction factor. Therefore, the gas must be known for the right correction factor to be applied.

Consequently, pellistor sensors and photo-ionization detectors can be considered complementary technologies for many applications. Pellistors are excellent at monitoring for methane, propane and other common combustible gases at %LEL levels. On the other hand, PID detects large VOC and hydrocarbon molecules that may be virtually undetectable by pellistor sensors, certainly in the parts-per-million range required to alert to toxic levels. Thus, the best approach in many environments is a multi-sensor instrument equipped with both technologies.


Subscribe to our blog

Join our mailing list to receive the latest blog!

    Read about Crowcon’s Privacy and Cookie policy here. If you change your mind, you can unsubscribe at any time.